Switch over to a more lisp'y syntax for the "for" statment docs

This commit is contained in:
Christopher Allan Webber 2013-04-01 11:01:36 -05:00
parent 93583b56a4
commit df6ef654d7

View File

@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ we might do::
The equivalent in hy would be::
(for [i (range 10)]
(for (i (range 10))
(print (+ "'i' is now at " (str i))))
TODO: explain the extra power of hy's for, the list comprehensions